You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 One-way sensitivity analyses of the costs of tuberculosis screening of nonimmigrant visa applicants: cost per estimated case averted by varying key parameters, by country

From: Cost effectiveness analysis of implementing tuberculosis screening among applicants for non-immigrant U.S. work visas

  India Mexico
Estimated U.S. cases prevented before U.S. arrival U.S. Savings ICER Estimated U.S. cases prevented before U.S. arrival U.S. savings ICER
Base case 138 $3,155,900 $151,388 41 $598,737 $221,088
Proportion with clinical findings suggestive of TBa (decreased by 50%) 69 1,577,950 299,463 21 $299,369 $452,715
Proportion with clinical findings suggestive of TBa (increased by 50%) NAb NA NA 62 $898,106 $143,879
Proportion of B1 persons diagnosed domestically (reduced by 50%) 138 $2,777,095 $154,135 41 $558,045 $222,075
Proportion of B1 persons diagnosed domestically (increased by 50%) 138 $3,534,706 $148,641 41 $639,430 $220,100
Time spent on panel physician treatment in India or Mexico (reduced by 67% of baseline) 138 $3,155,900 $42,654 41 $598,737 $189,459
Time spent on panel physician treatment in India or Mexico (increased by 67% of baseline) 138 $3,155,900 $260,665 41 $598,737 $252,875
Opportunity costs excluded 138 $499,180 Cost saving 41 $528,421 $175,200
  1. Notes: ICER Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio, U.S. United States
  2. aIn the model, individuals without clinical findings suggestive of TB do not go on to sputum culture/smear testing. If we assume that same rates of diagnosis (active TB) both overseas and at domestic follow-up for immigrants and NIVs, then this single parameter affects both the number of TB cases diagnosed overseas and the number of B1s. See Appendix Section A3 for details
  3. bWe did not evaluate a 50% increase for Indian NIVs because this did not seem plausible given
\